The Roswell Alien Autopsy – Fact or Fiction? • Latest UFO Sightings | UAP

The Roswell Incident of 1947 remains one of the most enduring mysteries in UFO lore. Central to this enigma is the so-called alien autopsy footage that captivated millions across the globe with its shocking images of extraterrestrial bodies. For decades, conspiracy theorists, skeptics, and believers have debated the authenticity of the footage, sparking curiosity, research, and government scrutiny. However, in recent years, new revelations and leaked documents have re-opened the debate about whether the footage is genuine or a sophisticated hoax.

A Brief History of the Roswell Incident

On July 8, 1947, headlines around the world reported the discovery of a “flying disc” in Roswell, New Mexico. Initial excitement quickly turned into speculation as the U.S. military retracted their statement, claiming the debris was merely from a weather balloon. This sudden shift in narrative only fueled suspicion, leading to numerous theories that the military had found and was covering up evidence of an extraterrestrial crash.

Years later, in 1995, the so-called alien autopsy footage was released to the public by British entrepreneur Ray Santilli. The grainy black-and-white footage appeared to show an autopsy being performed on an alien body, presumably from the Roswell crash. The footage reignited global interest in UFOs, and the debate over its authenticity has never truly subsided.

The Controversy Surrounding the Footage

For years, Ray Santilli adamantly defended the authenticity of the alien autopsy footage. According to Santilli, the film was genuine but had deteriorated over time. As a result, he claimed that some sections of the footage were “restored,” adding layers of confusion about its credibility. In 2006, Santilli admitted that much of the footage was a recreation based on the degraded original film, though he maintained that key elements were authentic.

This admission raised more questions than it answered. Why would there be two versions of the autopsy footage? If Santilli’s restoration was akin to restoring a historical painting, why were two films necessary? Skeptics quickly jumped on these inconsistencies, questioning whether the entire film was a fabricated hoax designed to capitalize on the public’s fascination with UFOs.

The Role of UFO Researchers and Skeptics

Even in the face of mounting skepticism, some researchers and believers remained…